Posts Tagged ‘On War’
The purpose of war is not battle; it is a more perfect peace. To attain peace, a belligerent must break the will of the enemy people to wage war. No nation goes to war to fight; it goes to attain its national purpose. It may be that a nation must destroy the enemy’s army to achieve this purpose. But the destruction is not the end; it is only the incidental by-product or the means to the end.
If a commander looks at the peace he is seeking at the conclusion of war, he may find numerous ways of attaining it by avoiding the enemy’s main force and striking at targets that may destroy the enemy’s desire or ability to wage war.
— Bevin Alexander, How Great Generals Win, p. 30
Tags: generalship, On War
Posted in excerpts on 2010/06/29
- skill in knowing the disposition and power of enemies,
- skill in knowing the ways to advance and withdraw,
- skill in knowing how empty or how full countries are,
- skill in knowing nature’s timing and human affairs, and
- skill in knowing the features of terrain.
- desire for the extraordinary and unexpected in strategy,
- desire for thoroughness in security,
- desire for calm among the masses, and
- desire for unity of hearts and minds.
— Thomas Cleary (translator and editor), Mastering the Art of War, p. 42
Tags: Asian, Chinese, generalship, On War
Posted in excerpts on 2010/06/28
The 6th-century [C.E. Byzantine] soldier was in fact much more than a cavalryman: he had become an all-around mounted warrior. With his bow he could skirmish at a distance, but he was also heavily armoured and well equipped for close mounted combat. When a steady force was needed to hold ground, he was quite happy to dismount and fight as a heavy infantryman. On many occasions Belisarius took only cavalrymen with him, and when Narses needed steady infantry, he dismounted his cavalry.
— Simon MacDowall, Late Roman Cavalryman: 236-565 AD, p. 24
Tags: archery, cavalry, infantry, On War, Roman
Posted in excerpts on 2010/06/28
The capacities of commanders are not the same; some are greater, some are lesser.
One who spies out treachery and disaster, who wins the allegiance of others, is the leader of ten men.
One who rises early in the morning and retires late at night, and whose words are discreet yet perceptive, is the leader of a hundred men.
One who is direct yet circumspect, who is brave and can fight, is the leader of a thousand men.
One of martial bearing and fierceness of heart, who knows the hardships of others and spares people from hunger and cold, is the leader of ten thousand men.
One who associates with the wise and promotes the able, who is careful of how he spends each day, who is sincere, trustworthy, and magnanimous, and who is guarded in times of order as well as times of disturbance, is the leader of a hundred thousand men.
One whose humanitarian care extends to all under his command, whose trustworthiness and justice win the allegiance of neighboring nations, who understands the signs of the sky above, the patterns of the earth below, and the affairs of humanity in between, and who regards all people as his family, is a world-class leader, one who cannot be opposed.
— Thomas Cleary (translator and editor), Mastering the Art of War, pp. 41-42
Tags: Asian, Chinese, generalship, On War
Posted in excerpts on 2010/06/27
Sieges—whether Sparta’s successful attack on Plataea or Athens’ ruination of Melos—were often not explicable in a traditional strategic calculus of cost versus benefits. After all, what did the possession of Plataea do for the Spartan cause? How was Athens made more secure, wealthier, or stronger by taking Melos? The rent from the farms of the Athenian colonists who settled in the surrounding countryside after the city fell could hardly have paid the cost of the long siege. Nor would the sale of captives into slavery recover the expenses of the besiegers. Instead, the efforts to storm recalcitrant cities seemed to confer enormous psychological implications on the reputation and competence of the two powers. Letting Plataea defiantly stand apart from Thebes or Mytilene boast of its independence was seen as a contagion that could weaken the entire system of alliances that had grown up after the Persian Wars.
— Victor Davis Hanson, A War Like No Other, p. 178
Tags: Greek, On War, sieges
Posted in excerpts on 2010/06/27